![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() DeCastro's petition alleged that UAI violated its probation (1) by perpetrating a fraud on the Court by lying about UAI's activities and prospects and concealing the existence of a second company, Urethane Applications North, Inc. Probation Officer Ronald DeCastro filed a petition requesting the revocation of Donald Freeman's supervised release and a petition requesting the revocation of UAI's probation. In March 1995 UAI made a single $30,000 payment on its fine only after becoming aware that the Government would be urging the filing of the instant revocation petitions. Freeman belatedly paid his individual fine only after the Government began investigating in the fall of l994 the nonpayment of the individual and corporate fines. UAI was fined $800,000 payable in installments over a five year period of probation. Donald Freeman was fined $160,000 and sentenced to serve a seven month prison term to be followed by one year of supervised release. On July 20, l993, this Court imposed sentence. On March 15, l993, UAI and Donald Freeman entered pleas of guilty to one-count of bid rigging in violation of 15 U.S.C. I FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The United States also sets forth herein the relief it will seek from this Court should the revocation petitions be granted. (UAI) and the supervised release of Donald Freeman. The United States, by and through its attorneys, hereby submits the following Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with respect to the petitions to revoke the probation of Urethane Applications, Inc. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |